The Madness And Science Behind The Donald Trump Handshake

Had French President Emmanuel Macron been playing close attention, he would have recognized quickly just how fraught his coming exchange with Donald Trump was to be.

The two leaders had met briefly earlier that day, exchanging a firm, prolonged, ?not innocent? handshake that drew attention for its unbound intensity. Now, hours later, as Macron approached Trump and other world leaders at the opening of NATO?s new headquarters in Brussels last week, the U.S. president offered several non-verbal cues indicating his desire to re-establish the global pecking order.

The first came well before he and Macron were face-to-face. Walking toward each other, Trump reached out to King Philippe of Belgium, who stood directly to his right, to offer an impromptu handshake. The King seemed caught off-guard. For good reason. No one in their group was making any such gesture.

Trump?s offer seemed out of place. But Florin Dolcos, a University of Illinois associate psychology professor and faculty member at the Beckman Institute?s Cognitive Neuroscience Group, suggested it was a deliberate. And the intended audience wasn?t Philippe but Macron.

?That?s a signal Trump was sending: ?This is where you should come first because I?m the alpha here,?? Dolcos said. ??Iinitiated with the other guy.??

Moments later, another cue. With the two still walking towards each other, Trump looked up at Macron and opened his arms ? a signal typically reserved for family and friends, not two world leaders who?d just met. Once again, Dolcos suspected Trump was making a nonverbal signal to his French counterpart.

?I think it is a learned behavior. Because typically you don?t do that. You do it with people very close to you in natural circumstances. Not people you don?t really know,? he said. ?In a way it could be seen as a trap.?

Macron didn?t fall for it. Instead, he greeted a few others before making his way to Trump. When he did finally arrive, Trump pounced, taking Macron?s hand and pulling it violently away from his body with enough force to turn Macron roughly 50 degrees.

Dolcos again saw a tactical play. Unable to torque his arm, Macron was rendered powerless. He attempted to pull away and Trump refused to let him go.

Macron put his other hand on Trump to pry himself loose. And when he finally freed himself, Trump gave him a pat on the shoulder, ending the exchange squarely on his terms.

Another bizarre, dramatic, uncomfortable handshake with a world leader was in the books, bouncing its way across the Internet to the wonderment of all.

?It goes down to asserting dominance,? said Dolcos. ?Why he wants to do that? I don?t know. It looks, to me, like he is trying too hard?. It looks ridiculous?

If you want to better understand Donald Trump ? his presidency, his approach personal diplomacy, even his psyche ? simply follow his hands.

Those hands, and their unexceptional digits, have been the source of immense insecurity, prompting him to lash out at critics and boast about his genitalia. They give insights into his marriage for the way they search ? ever so subtly and often unsuccessfully ? for his wife?s embrace. They tell us about his comfort in office as he attempts to find his footing on the world stage. And they illustrate his preoccupation with imagery and the role it plays in advancing his agenda.

?I just think the president is very cognizant of the optics of what it looks like at these multilateral meetings with world leaders,? said Sam Nunberg, a former Trump aide, ?and I even think [the handshake] is symbolic to the America First theme of his presidency and campaign.?

The Trump handshake has become most unique greeting in all of politics. Before he nearly tore off Emmanuel Macron?s arm, Trump crushed the fingers of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

When he unveiled his Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch during a East Wing ceremony, he followed suit by yanking the Justice?s entire body three times in his direction.

Trump memorably refused to shake hands with German Chancellor Angela Merkel when she visited him in a testy Oval Office exchange.

And he went grip-to-grip for an uncomfortable length of time with an obviously prepared Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada.

In a short time, the Trump handshake has become so legendary that world leaders have been compelled to prepare in advance. Trudeau seemed to have done his homework and so had Macron during his first interaction with Trump. Hillary Clinton prepared for a variety of over-the-top Trump gestures in the lead-up to their debates. But her aide, Philippe Reines, who played Trump in debate prep, said the handshake never came up in practice sessions.

?I never tried to rip her arm out of its socket,? he told HuffPost.

Trump?s approach to the handshake is a combination of brute force and strategic discomfort. He doesn?t so much shake the hand as he consumes the very arm of the person he?s embracing. The goal, it appears, is to establish a geographic zone and bring his counterpart into it.

Trump almost always initiates, with a semi-open palm thrust at his counterpart. Often, his eyes dart not to the person across from him but down at his hand itself ? an early hint at where the drama will be. When the gesture is joined, Trump clasps firmly and tugs violently inward. Sometimes, he motions up and down but frequently he will use a lumberjack approach (back and forth). Occasionally, he?ll twist his counterpart?s hand in odd directions or use his free hand fortify the clasp. Rarely does he let go first.

Unexpected recipients often seem stunned. Some, like Abe, show visible relief when it ends. And those who prepare in advance recognize it for what it is: an overt power play.

?It?s an intimidation tactic. There are self-preservation strategies and intimidation is one of the main ones,? said Frank Bernieri, an associate professor in the psychology department at Oregon State University, who has written on the influence of the handshake. ?This is perfectly consistent with Trump. He pretty much says that?s what I do to make a deal.?

This is perfectly consistent with Trump. He pretty much says that?s what I do to make a deal.
Frank Bernieri, associate professor, psychology department at Oregon State University.

Handshakes were not invented as vehicles to exhibit dominance. In their earliest depictions, they were seen as means of sealing alliances and exhibiting intimacy. Research says that handshakes can leave lasting impressions about a person?s conscientiousness and that different variables can affect the efficacy of the handshake. What is less agreed upon is the ability of handshakes to assert authority.

The handshake as a power move has been mythologized in film and popularized in the world of business. But some researchers say that as a practical matter, it doesn?t actually work.

?Such attempts would usually be ineffective because the main point of a handshake is to establish a sense of mutuality and mutual respect,? emailed Howard Friedman, editor-in-chief of the Journal of Nonverbal Behavior and a professor in the psychology department at the University of California, Riverside.

?[S]omeone who uses or attempts to use such a power or intimidation handshake either 1) already has the power and would also simultaneously be employing other status signals like elevated height, invasive touching, higher-status clothing, and other dominance cues from face, voice, gaze, and posture; or 2) is misjudging the likely reactions of the other person and/or the audience,? Friedman said.

Trump doesn?t abide by this theory. His handshakes are clear attempts to assert alpha dominance.

Take when Trump greeted Tajikistan president Emomali Rahmon. In this incident, Rahmon played the role of the aggressor, grabbing and shaking Trump?s hand in the same manner as Trump did with Macron. What impressed Dolcos is what came next. Instead of pulling away ? which is the natural inclination ? Trump stepped closer in. Doing so allowed his arm to once again be torqued, which, in turn, allowed him to re-establish physical control and affirm his stature within Rahmon?s own orbit. It was a ?rebalance of the power play,? as Dolcos put it. ?It is a little bit of body rotation so it looks natural.?

Those close to Trump say they don?t believe he rehearses these moments. But Dolcos suspects that he does. The patterns are so apparent and the gestures so demonstrable that it seems only natural that Trump has thought them through. That?s true even in instances where there is no handshake at all.  

At an earlier stop in his trip abroad, Trump met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. After the two sat for the camera, Netanyahu stood up first and offered his hand. Trump ignored the gesture, walking the other way.

Observers assumed that Trump either didn?t notice his counterpart or got lost in the moment. Dolcos had a different theory.

?It is another way of establishing rank, which is that he is the one initiating,? he said. ??I?m not going in when you initiate. I?m probably ignoring it and then I?ll come back. This is now when we are doing this. Not when you initiate it.??

The most curious part of Trump?s handshake is that he reportedly hates shaking hands. He has called such greetings ?barbaric? and ?one of the curses of American society.? He is a rumored germaphobe who dispenses Purell sanitizer.

And yet, despite those hesitations, Trump entered a field where the handshake is even more fundamental than in the world of business. Politics is built on handshakes.

Neil Makhija was a body man for Joe Sestak when the Democrat ran unsuccessfully in 2010 for the Senate in Pennsylvania. He recalled how his boss would weave back-and-forth, side to side during July 4th parades instead of walking down the middle of the street. He wanted to shake every hand he could touch.

?There is a tendency among politicians that if you reach a voter they will kind of see the light,? Makhija said. ?You think the more people you touch, the more likely you will win.? 

Makhija went on to become an advance man for Vice President Joe Biden and, once again, handshaking found its way into his portfolio. Whenever Biden would meet a politician or dignitary, his aides would game plan the meeting, including that initial greeting.

?There is no question that when you have an advance team for the White House, every single detail is discussed in terms of where the shake is going to happen, what is the backdrop and what?s behind you and all these things,? said Makhija.

Unlike Biden or Sestak, Trump doesn?t see the handshake as a means of establishing cordiality or mutuality with his counterpart. He doesn?t conceive of it as means of winning votes or facilitating diplomacy. He imagines it as a display of alpha-ness. This makes him unique among U.S. presidents and a marvel for the YouTube age. Then again, what else would one expect from Donald Trump?

?If we are talking about his handshake, it is kind of analogous to us talking about him when he takes his finger and says, ?You?re fired,?? said Nunberg. ?There is nobody who is a better showman and more cognizant of the optics than I?ve ever worked with than him.?

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

New Orleans Principal Fired After Video Captures Him Wearing Nazi-Associated Rings

A charter school principal in New Orleans has lost his job after video surfaced of him appearing to wear Nazi-associated rings.

The video, which appeared Thursday, shows then-Principal Nicholas Dean of Crescent Leadership Academy holding an American flag and a shield as he discusses talking to six journalists who ?appeared to me completely soulless.?

Dean, who identifies himself in the video as Nick Andrews, is also seen wearing a helmet, goggles, and two rings closely associated with Nazism. One appears to be of the German Iron Cross and another a skull ring that was awarded to leading members of the Nazi party, according to the local Times-Picayune. 

?If foreigners come here with Marxist ideas and Marxist tactics … it?s my duty to be here,? Dean can be heard saying in the video.

Crescent Leadership Academy said Dean was terminated Thursday.

?Educators are role models, and they should prioritize this sacred role above all else,? Superintendent Kunjan Narechania said in a statement. ?While the circumstances surrounding this decision are regrettable and damaging, I appreciate the board making a swift decision so that school can move forward and so that our community can continue to heal.? 

Dean?s firing came as he was already being investigated after photos emerged of the principal standing next to a Confederate flag and a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee prior to its removal earlier this month.

?I didn?t go to protest for either side,? Dean told the Times-Picayune at the time. ?I went because I am a historian, educator and New Orleans resident who wanted to observe this monumental event,? he said. ?People who know me know that I am a crusader for children and I fight tirelessly on their behalf.?

But an investigation by the Times-Picayune also turned up a podcast that Dean was featured on ? under the alias Nick Andrews ? where he discusses his work in predominantly black schools.

?I started seeing how the black community looked at each other and how race and tribe is so powerful for them, and I really respected that,? Dean says in the podcast. ?Even though they fight a lot, kind of tribally, there?s a sense of unity among blacks that?s just understood. That was when I began my own kind of identity, if you will, quest.? 

In the podcast, Dean refers to Take ?Em Down NOLA ? a group that has advocated for removing Confederate monuments ? as a ?black supremacy movement.? 

Dean says in the podcast that he is not a white supremacist, but that by other people?s definition of one, he ?most certainly? is. He adds that going to graduate school with ?radical leftists? changed his worldview.

?If these people get their way, I don?t exist,? Dean says.

New Orleans has recently made a massive push to remove Confederate monuments in the city. After Robert E. Lee?s statue was taken down, Mayor Mitch Landrieu made an impassioned speech celebrating the removal.

?These statues are not just stone and metal,? Landrieu told a crowd at Gallier Hall. ?They are not just innocent remembrances of a benign history. These monuments purposefully celebrate a fictional, sanitized Confederacy, ignoring the death, ignoring the enslavement and the terror that it actually stood for.?

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Content articlesList=59284fb8e4b0df57cbfb5580,56730ebce4b0648fe302a040,5923345ae4b034684b0eb7c4


— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Hillary Clinton Questions Media Trying To ‘Appease’ Conservatives After Election

Some news organizations have beefed up their ranks with conservative voices since the 2016 presidential election, a response Hillary Clinton said is misguided.

?The cable networks seem to me to be folding into a posture of, ?Oh, we want to try to get some of those people on the right, so maybe we better be more, quote, evenhanded,?? Clinton said in an interview with New York magazine published Friday. 

Author Rebecca Traister described how Clinton?s ?brow furrows? upon mention of climate change skeptics Bret Stephens and George Will recently joining The New York Times and MSNBC, respectively. 

?Why ? would ? you ? do ? that? Sixty-six million people voted for me, plus, you know, the crazy third-party people,? said Clinton, who won the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. ?So there?s a lot of people who would actually appreciate stronger arguments on behalf of the most existential challenges facing our country and the world, climate change being one of them! It?s clearly a commercial decision. But I don?t think it will work. I mean, they?re laughing on the right at these puny efforts to try to appease people on the right.?

Clinton also jabbed at The New York Times for recently launching a feature encouraging people to ?Say Something Nice? about President Donald Trump?I never saw them do that for me.?

Looking back on the 2016 race, Clinton said she ?underestimated? the impact of WikiLeaks publishing unflattering emails from members of the Democratic Party. The U.S. intelligence community has since concluded that Russian hackers stole the messages.

Emails dripped out daily in October in a fashion that was ?innocuous, boring, inconsequential,? Clinton said ? yet people ?played like it was some breathless flash.? She said conservative media outlets amplified the contents of the emails, but added that the mainstream press played its own role in giving the documents outsize attention. 

?Look, we have an advocacy press on the right that has done a really good job for the last 25 years,? Clinton said. ?They have a mission. They use the rights given to them under the First Amendment to advocate a set of policies that are in their interests, their commercial, corporate, religious interests. Because the advocacy media occupies the right, and the center needs to be focused on providing as accurate information as possible. Not both-sides-ism and not false equivalency.?

Read Traister?s full piece here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

A Man Is Serving 10 Years In Prison Because Of The Crime He Was Acquitted Of

Ramad Chatman, a black man from Rome Georgia, is serving a 10-year prison sentence after an entire jury found him not guilty of a crime he says he did not commit. 

On May 24, Georgia news station 11 Alive published a report on Chatman?s interactions with the justice system, which began with a first-time offender probation and ends with Chatman serving 10 years in prison ? despite a jury finding him not guilty of a crime he was accused of in between.

The outlet recounts the story, speaking with family members and legal experts in the video above. 

In July 2014, Chatman was accused of a crime in connection to an armed robbery at a corner store in Georgia. Police say the store was too dirty to collect fingerprints from, and four witnesses who were there that night say all they saw was a ?black man in dark clothes,? according to 11 Alive. Camera footage also captured an unidentifiable black man. 

However, it wasn?t until months after the night of the robbery, when the store clerk was scrolling through her Facebook, that she randomly came across a photo of Chatman on her feed. 

?It triggered something in me, and it just made me freak out,? she testified, according to 11 Alive.

The clerk reported Chatman to the police. He went to the police ? he?d heard they were looking for him.

?He turned himself in because he knew he was not guilty,? his grandmother Janice Chatman told 11 Alive. 

After Chatman came forward to police in 2015 to rule himself out as a suspect in the corner store robbery, he was arrested for it.

Chatman had been in trouble with the law once before. He was sentenced to first-offender probation of five years at the age of 19, when he entered a guilty plea for stealing a $120 television. His grandmother said he paid his fines and completed community service. He faced a probation hearing, where Superior Court Judge Jack Niedrach decided Chatman did likely rob the store. Chatman?s probation was revoked, and per rules surrounding 

When police arrested Chatman in connection with the 2014 corner store robbery, he was still on probation. He faced a hearing to reconsider the terms of the probation, where Superior Court Judge Jack Niedrach decided Chatman did likely rob the store, which legally, was enough for the judge to revoke his original probation.

Per rules surrounding the first offender status, this meant Chatman was re-sentenced for his original crime. He was ordered to serve 10 years in prison, backdated to his first brush with the law.  

Six months later, a jury found Chatman not guilty of the corner store robbery. They acquitted him of armed robbery and aggravated assault. Despite the verdict, the judge chose not reinstate Chatman?s probation, according to 11 Alive.

Chatman will remain in prison until 2022 for getting arrested for a crime a journey acquitted him of but a judge thinks he ?likely? committed while on probation for an earlier charge. 

The jury?s verdict is unsurprising. There was no certified evidence that Chatman robbed the convenient store. Transcripts from court proceedings, reviewed by 11 Alive, showed that her description of the suspect changed each time she testified. She reportedly misremembered the color of her attacker?s weapon and the clothes he wore, among other things. 

?What would bother most people about this is when people tell stories over and over again, they?re supposed to remain consistent,? Mark Issa, Chatman?s attorney, told the site. 

While Issa expressed sympathy for the emotional trauma the clerk experienced, he said Chatman is not the man responsible for the crime and that her anger was misdirected. In fact, Chatman tried to enter an Alford plea ? which is a guilty plea where the defendant also maintains his innocence ? before the trial began, but it was dismissed and his case went before a jury.

Ultimately, Chatman is currently serving a 10-year prison sentence for his initial crime of stealing a $120 TV.

Retired Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Norman Fletcher told the Rome News-Tribune last year that Chatman?s case reflects a failing in the legal system that continues to feed into America?s gross issue of incarceration. 

?The law does not always lead to a wise and just conclusion, in my opinion,? Fletcher said. ?We can?t afford to continue to lock up more and more people.? 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.